Such questions were raised recently in reference to stories linking the Sackler household, distinguished cultural donors, to the corporate that produces OxyContin, the highly effective painkiller that has been concerned in opioid overdoses. And a few objected to the renaming of the Metropolitan Museum of Artwork’s fountain plaza after the conservative philanthropist David H. Koch in 2014 (he gave $65 million).
“A political litmus take a look at for who ought to serve could be very damaging to a nonprofit establishment,” stated Reynold Levy, the previous president of Lincoln Middle. “So long as the mission and vital parts of this system are supported by the trustee, what they do within the political world shouldn’t be related.”
A similar effort by scientists, in 2015, known as on the museum to chop ties with Mr. Koch, then a trustee. Lower than a yr later, having served on the board for 23 years, Mr. Koch resigned. On the time, each Mr. Koch and the museum stated that the resignation was unrelated to the stress marketing campaign.
In March final yr, a bunch of staff filed complaints with the museum’s human assets division in an try and spur an inside dialog about Ms. Mercer’s function on the board, however nothing got here of it, in keeping with one particular person concerned within the effort who declined to be recognized for worry of repercussions.
The museum emphasised that scientists and educators on the museum make selections about scientific and academic content material, not trustees and donors.
“We consider that human-induced local weather change is well-supported by scientific proof and is likely one of the most severe points presently dealing with our planet,” the assertion stated. “We’re deeply dedicated to presenting evidence-based, scientific details about local weather change to a broad public.”
The most recent push to oust Ms. Mercer from the museum board was spearheaded by the Natural History Museum, a nonprofit touring museum that additionally led the 2015 drive to take away Mr. Koch.
“Museums are among the many most trusted sources of data in society,” the group’s co-founder and director, Beka Economopoulos, stated in an electronic mail. “Having a science denier and high funder of local weather science denial campaigns in a management place at a science museum undermines the establishment’s credibility.”
Ms. Mercer, a daughter of the hedge fund magnate Robert Mercer, has been on the museum’s board since 2013. The Mercer Household Basis has lengthy supported a wide range of conservative causes, together with Breitbart Information, the influential right-wing web site based by Andrew Breitbart and until recently run by Stephen K. Bannon, Mr. Trump’s former chief strategist.
The Mercer household publicly distanced itself from Mr. Bannon this month after Mr. Bannon’s provocative remarks about Mr. Trump have been reported in Michael Wolff’s guide, “Hearth and Fury: Contained in the Trump White Home.”
The Mercers had funded Breitbart News by a $2 million donation to a bunch known as the Authorities Accountability Institute, which Mr. Bannon co-founded, in keeping with the inspiration’s 2016 tax filings.
The tax data additionally present that the Mercers have given slightly over $19 million to a wide range of conservative teams, together with at the least three that reject the scientific consensus round fossil fuel-driven local weather change: the Heartland Institute in Illinois, in addition to the CO2 Alliance and the Middle for the Research of Carbon Dioxide and World Change. The inspiration has given almost $5.9 million to the Heartland Institute since 2008, in comparison with about $four million to the museum since 2012.
The Mercer Household Basis has additionally donated to New York Metropolis hospitals in addition to the Nationwide Youth Science Basis, which runs summer time camps. However most of its cash goes to conservative causes, together with the Becket Fund, a non secular freedom group that opposes abortion.
The inspiration’s 2016 return isn’t but obtainable on the Inner Income Service web site. It was shared with The Instances by the Local weather Investigations Middle, which tracks funding for organizations that reject established local weather science. It’s primarily based in Washington and is supported by nameless donors looking for to restrict the dangers of local weather change.